Saturday, 18 October 2014

Donald Fagen: Cool Perfection

Icon: Donald Fagen

Dylan Jones
12 February 2014

As one half of Steely Dan, Donald Fagen was responsible for what many consider to be one of the greatest albums ever made, 1977's jazz-infused masterpiece, Aja. With a career that has seen him veer from rock stardom to pathological secrecy, via long periods of inactivity, Fagen remains one of the most enigmatic men in the music industry, and adored by the likes of Kanye West, Daft Punk and Mark Ronson.

Like most bands from before my time, I discovered Steely Dan through rap music, specifically because 'Peg' had been sampled by De La Soul on 3 Feet High And Rising," says Mark Ronson. "That was about 20 years ago, and I discover new things every time I put a Steely Dan record on. I'm still discovering songs for the first time. No other band managed to let groove and intellect coexist as seamlessly. The most incredible rhythm sections with the most captivating narratives and these crazy chord changes."

You can tell almost all you need to know about a person by asking them what sort of music they like. And although that's the sort of question usually only asked (and answered) by boys between the ages of 12 and 18, I was asked it a while ago by someone I'd never met before. It felt like a childish thing to be asked, but even though I could have easily beaten it back by saying something flippant - the last One Direction single, the next Jake Bugg album - I was stumped.

The American writer Chuck Klosterman said that, having for many years ­experimented with a litany of abstract responses when asked this question, he started to say, with some honesty as well as accuracy, "Music that sounds like the opening 14 seconds of Humble Pie's 'I Don't Need No Doctor', as performed live on their 1971 album, Performance: Rockin' The Fillmore."

Now, never having heard the record in question, I couldn't comment - although it certainly sounds like the sort of thing I wouldn't like at all - but apparently it has the desired effect, the reply having the added bonus of changing the conversation, or (preferable, this) ending it entirely.

Usually, the answers to questions like these are either endearingly banal: "Oh, the usual, you know, Jay-Z, the Beatles, a bit of Coldplay"; unbearably pretentious: "the first five Fall singles and pretty much nothing else before or since"; or, in the case of most politicians, simply lies.

Having thought about it myself, I've decided to adopt Chuck's policy. Initially I thought of just saying "Steely Dan", because it not only shows confidence (by any modern definition of the term, they're not really what anyone would call cool), but like Marmite, they are an acquired taste, and unless you're an aficionado,­ you'll probably hate them.

However, like Chuck, I've decided to be annoyingly specific, and while I thought about singing the praises, yet again, of their sixth album, Aja, the next time someone asks me what kind of music I like I'm going to say, having first locked them in with my most sincere stare, "Music that sounds like the guitar solo in 'Green Earrings' [from Steely Dan's fifth album, 1976's The Royal Scam], the one that arrives after two minutes and seven seconds, the one that makes you feel as though you're cruising over the Florida Keys' Seven Mile Bridge in a rented Mustang."

And if I were asked what the best album of all time is? Well, it isn't Nevermind, isn't Revolver, and isn't Pet Sounds. Strangely it isn't even Rumours, London Callingor the Ramones' Leave Home. No, the best album of all time was released at the end of August 1977, just as the sweltering Summer of Hate was beginning to wilt, a record that has nothing to do with the Sex Pistols, the Clash or the Jam (who all released classic LPs that year), and which has no affinity with the estuarial guttersnipe squall of punk. In fact this record is as far away from the insurgency of punk as southern California is from the Westway.

Steely Dan weren't just up my street; they were, to paraphrase Nick Hornby, knocking on my door, pressing the intercom and peering through the letter box to see if I was in. Which I was, crouched over the B&O, devouring the pop-art dystopia that was the DNA of the Steely Dan brand (available in different forms on Can't Buy A Thrill,Countdown To Ecstasy, Pretzel Logic, Katy Lied and more.

Aja was their high-water mark. You can keep your Zuma, your Neon Bible, your Back To Black, your Parachutes, and your OK Computer. You can even keep The Chronic. They might all be straight from the heart, but Steely Dan'sAja offers the delights of a world uncharted by pop groups, past or present. Those who hate the band call them sterile, surgical, cold. Which is sort of the point. Fagen and his band mate Walter Becker - fundamentally sociopaths masquerading as benign dictators - like to give the impression they're being as insincere as possible, the very antithesis, frankly, of almost everyone else in the music business.

Aja is as gentrified and as anal a record as you'll ever hope to hear. Fagen and Becker's masterpiece is a homage to passive-aggressive studio cool, even though they were as disdainful of the palm tree and flared-denim world of Los Angeles as the whey-faced urchins from west London. The band's nihilism is plain for all to hear, disguised as FM-friendly soft rock. Fagen's lyrics are dispassionate, the architecture of their songs often labyrinthine, the guitar solos ridiculously sarcastic. Yet on Aja they made some of the most sophisticated, most polished, most burnished music ever heard: "Black Cow", "Deacon Blues", "Home At Last" and the rest. Aja is also the record that many musicians rate as the personification of musical excellence. Technically and sonically it is beyond compare. (The late New York Times critic Robert Palmer - no relation to the singer - said that Steely Dan's music sounded like it had been "recorded in a hospital ward".)

You rarely meet a musician who doesn't love some aspect of Aja, and whenever I've interviewed a rock star at their home, I've often seen a CD copy around the place somewhere. It used to be played constantly in those places where you went to buy expensive hi-fi equipment, and can still be heard in the type of luxury retailers who understand the notion of immersive wealth. Having ­listened to the album's "Deacon Blues", Ricky Ross named his band after it, while "Peg" would become widely known because De La Soul sampled it on "Eye Know". Three years ago it was deemed by the Library of Congress to be "culturally, historically, or aesthetically­ important" and added to the United States National Recording Registry. Get them!

At the time Becker and Fagen were hard task-masters in the studio, and would hire dozens of session musicians to record the same guitar solo or drum fill until they felt they had something approaching what they had imagined. They were obsessive perfectionists who spent millions of dollars relentlessly torturing the dozens of Grade-A guitarists who apparently weren't "yacht-smooth" enough. Musicians would spend hours, sometimes days, in one of the many Los Angeles studios that Steely Dan used to record Aja, only to find that their work had been jettisoned in favour of someone else's.

"We just kept adjusting our standards higher and higher," says Becker, "so many days we'd make guys do 30 or 40 takes and never listen to any of them again, because we knew none of them were any good; but we just kept hoping that somehow it was just going to miraculously­ get good."

He later said: "The studio is all about the idea of the setup, particularly for men. A room where you have all this technology to help you, and where you have some toys. It's about that space-age bachelor-pad vibe. The studio satisfies a lot of those urges. And you need air-conditioning, and a book with menus in it. It's kind of a minimum livable standard, really."

At the time of Aja, Fagen and Becker were New Yorkers on location in LA, and although they revelled in the recording facilities and the abundance of great musicians, seemingly on tap - they spent their days getting studio tans as opposed to any other kind - they found the city faintly ridiculous.

"LA was certainly a lot of laughs," says Fagen. "Neither of us really liked it, because we just weren't LA-type people. We called it Planet Stupid. Nobody seemed to understand us there."

"Becker and Fagen are interesting characters, sort of isolationists by nature," said one of their session musicians at the time. "They live in these houses in Malibu, not near anybody, and I have a feeling LA helps them keep their music going on a certain level - they're almost laughing at the people in their songs."

Almost? Still, they weren't above sentimentality. There was always a kind of skeuomorphic feel about Steely Dan records, in that they are imbued with a certain nostalgia, even though the songs themselves were incredibly modern.

Aja was a case in point. Released at a time when both punk and disco were experiencing their own apotheoses, it seemed completely­ at odds with anything else. As a testament to that, the record was remixed 13 times in the five months before its release. Becker and Fagen were scathing about the hard-rock world - finding groups like Led Zeppelin and Bad Company preposterous - and were far more interested in the construction of old jazz records. For them, the only correct response to the entire culture of "rock" was to be dismissive about it. They were occasionally, and unfairly, compared to the soporific jazz-rock that seeped across US radio in the Seventies, as their obsession with technical proficiency was mistaken for musical indolence.

Fagen and Becker were far more radical than that, and although they expressed the same disdain for punk and disco as they felt for the hegemony of mainstream rock, they enjoyed the fact that both were rebelling against the orthodoxy of FM radio. Not only that, but Fagen always seemed to be singing with one eyebrow raised.

Nevertheless, Aja oozed a detached sophistication that was all its own, the highly polished surface disguising awkward time signatures and extra-credit guitar fills.

"We're actually accused of starting smooth jazz, which I don't think is exactly true," says Fagen. "A lot of the effects we got were intended to be comic, like 'Hey Nineteen' [from 1980's Gaucho]. We were in our thirties, still saddled with these enormous sex drives and faced with the problem that you can no longer talk to a 19-year-old girl because the culture has changed. That's set against an extremely polite little groove. And then the chorus is set to jazz chords, and when you play them on electronic instruments there's a flattening effect, a dead kind of sound. And it's scored for falsetto voices, which adds to the effect. To me, it's very funny. Other people think it's nauseating."

Some people rejected the idea that a rock group could sound so slick. For them, rock should be "guts and fire and feeling" in the words of Steely Dan fan Nick Hornby, "not difficult chords and ironic detachment".

What has never been revealed is how much Becker and Fagen were enthralled by disco. "They had all these records that were just whack-whack, so perfect, the beat never fluctuated, and we didn't see why we couldn't have that too," says Becker, "except playing this incredibly complicated music, and the drummer would go and play a great fill or something and come exactly back at the perfect beat at the same tempo, you know? It seemed like a good idea."

Like a lot of those obsessed by recondite impulses, both Fagen and Becker were as intimidated as they were dismissive about the popular and the cool.

At the time, Fagen said, "We write the same way a writer of fiction would write. We're basically assuming the role of a character, and for that reason it may not sound personal." Becker added, "This is not the Lovin' Spoonful. It's not real good-time music."

White-hot chops and black humour, more like. Yet Steely Dan were actually cooler than anyone. Maybe not on a haberdashery level, but cool all the same.

As the band didn't project their personalities, determined instead to anonymously tell their tales of dissipated, sun-bleached Seventies California angst, they became faceless. "This is what happens when you don't construct an archetypal persona," says Chuck Klosterman. "If you're popular and melodic and faceless, you seem meaningless. [Look at] Steely Dan, a group who served as the house band for every 1978 West Coast singles band despite being more lyrically subversive than the Sex Pistols and the Clash combined. If a musician can't convince people that he's cool, nobody cool is going to care."

As a personality, Fagen is an acquired taste - but then he always was. He never warmed to the weave of the sleeve and, like his music, was always perhaps a little too cool, dry and fastidious. In this sense an important sign of legitimacy has been missing, but then this is what makes Fagen who he is: someone who doesn't need validation.

"Years ago, I flew out to LA to visit a girlfriend who dumped me as soon as I arrived," says Mark Ronson. "I couldn't change my ticket so I had to stay in LA, miserable, for five days. I bought the Steely Dan songbook and a cheap electric piano and stayed in my room for the duration of the time, teaching myself those songs. I don't often think of the girl but I use those amazing chord voicings nearly every day."

Cyberpunk eminence William Gibson is a huge fan, and liberally sprinkles his novels with band references: "A lot of people think of Steely Dan as the epitome of boring Seventies stuff, never realising this is probably the most subversive material pop has ever thrown up."

"It lifts your heart up," said the late Ian Dury. "It's the most consistently upful."

Film-makers the Farrelly brothers based an entire soundtrack on them, with eight Steely Dan songs covered by the likes of Wilco, Ben Folds Five and the Brian Setzer Orchestra featured in their 2000 movie Me, Myself & Irene. "Only one person turned down our request to do a cover, and that was Jonathan Richman," says Peter Farrelly. "I called him up and said, 'Look, will you do a cover of a Steely Dan song?' He called back and said, 'Uh, Peter, I'd like to do this, but the lyrics - I don't know what they mean. I never understood what they were saying.' When Jonathan sings, he puts his whole heart into it, so he passed."

They have another film fan in Judd Apatow: "I don't think I have listened to any band more than Steely Dan," he says. "They are a bottomless pit of joy. The songs are gorgeous, the lyrics are mysterious and witty. When I was young I used those records as a gateway drug to learn about a lot of great jazz performers. I would read the credits and buy the albums of all the people who played on their records. That led to thousands of hours listening to the Brecker Brothers, Larry Carlton, Phil Woods, Wayne Shorter and countless others."

The Blackpool singer Rae Morris, who has toured with Noah And The Whale and Tom Odell, is a fan, albeit begrudgingly. "I was exposed to a lot of Steely Dan when I was little," she says. "I hated it [then] but now I'm starting to think it was a good musical influence."

Other fans include Phoenix and Daft Punk. The latter have made no secret of their fondness for the band, whose influence can be heard all over last year's Random Access Memories. "If people still went into stereo shops and bought stereos regularly, like they did during the era Daft Punk draw from, this record, with its meticulously recorded analog sound, would be an album to test out a potential system, right up there with Steely Dan's Aja and Pink Floyd's Dark Side Of The Moon," wrote Pitchfork's Mark Richardson. "Daft Punk make clear that one way to 'give life back to music' is through the power of high fidelity."

The band are a sampling smorgasbord, and have been grazed by Beyoncé ("Black Cow" on the J'Ty remix of 2004's "Me, Myself And I"), Ice Cube ("Green Earrings" on 1992's "Don't Trust 'Em"), Hit-Boy featuring John Legend ("The Boston Rag" on 2012's "WyW"), Naughty By Nature ("Third World Man" on 1999's "Live Or Die") and dozens more. Kanye West famously sampled their 1976 hit "Kid Charlemagne" on his 2007 single "Champion", although not without a lot of heavy lifting. "From time to time, we get requests for licences for hip-hoppers to use part of an old song or something," says Fagen. "We usually say yes, but we didn't like the general curve of the way that one sounded...

"Kanye actually sent us a sample of his tunes and, frankly, Walter and I listened to it, and although we'd love some of the income, neither of us particularly liked what he had done with it. We said no at first, and then he wrote us a handwritten letter that was kind of touching, about how the song was about his father, and he said, 'I love your stuff, and I really want to use it because it's a very personal thing for me.'"

Surprisingly, the plea worked.

Somewhat perversely, Fagen and Becker were the winners of the 1999 award from the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers for the most-played rap song, "Deja Vu (Uptown Baby)" by Lord Tariq and Peter Gunz, who had used the intro from "Black Cow." "Ascap sent us these handsome plaques, but they told us we shouldn't come to the ceremony," said Becker. "They said there was some violence the year before and we should stay at home. So I did." The rappers, who had originally­ used the song without a licence, managed to irritate P Diddy, too. According to Fagen, "They were angry because the sample had already been licensed for Puff Daddy and Mase. We actually heard that Puff Daddywas riding around in a limo with Lenny Kravitz and went crazy when he heard it. He said, 'They stole my sample!'"

Donald Fagen met his future songwriting partner Walter Becker while studying at Bard College, a private liberal arts college in Annandale-On-Hudson in New York State, in the mid-Sixties. He was 19, Becker two years his junior. "I was walking past this small building that they used for entertainment of the student body, who were very idle and bored most of the term," says Fagen. "And I heard what I assumed was Howlin' Wolf playing... I walked in and there was Walter with this red Epiphone guitar." They clicked immediately, both being shy, snarky smartasses obsessed with bookish cool.

As a boy, Fagen was deeply into sci-fi, and was even a member of the Science Fiction Book Club. "That was the golden age of science fiction; all the great writers were active then. I loved CM Kornbluth, AE van Vogt. I liked the guys who were really social satirists. A lot of these guys came out of the socialist movement of the Thirties, and they had a very funny way of criticising society. I really learned a lot from them. Certainly [from] Alfred Bester. He was a New Yorker. His first novel, The Demolished Man, got the rapid flow of life in the city, which I think is still present. There's something about the flow of Alfred Bester's prose that I think affected the way Walter and I write lyrics."

When Fagen was a teenager, cool was rare, cool was underground. Nowadays the very idea of being hip is so commodified - and so available - that it is simply a part of a lifestyle experience. Back then, in the days when you had to seek out culturally subversive writers and like-minded souls, being cool meant being part of a very small club.

"When Walter and I met, we had a constellation of enthusiasms, really: science fiction, jazz, black humour, novels by Thomas Berger, Terry Southern, Philip Roth, Vladimir Nabokov, Kurt Vonnegut especially. That certainly influenced the lyric writing. We also liked comic songwriting, like Tom Lehrer. He was a piano player and songwriter who wrote these grim, funny songs [Exhibit A: 'Poisoning Pigeons In The Park']. And then we were both fans of Frank Zappa and the Fugs."

He was also a huge fan of WC Fields, a man who understood that "most of life is just, you have to have the appearance that you know what you're doing".

Fagen and Becker started writing together,­ and eventually - after deciding to pursue songwriting as career when they left college - spent months pestering the publishing teams in New York's Brill Building before being hired almost on a whim as staff songwriters by ABC Records producer Gary Katz and shipped out to California. Having initially tried to form various groups - with traditionally clever-clogs names such as Leather Canary and The Bad Rock Group (at one point employing fellow student Chevy Chase as drummer) - they realised their forte was writing, not performing. Then, finding their songs were unsuitable for ABC's artists - why would the likes of Dusty Springfield want to sing spiteful, gloomy songs about goofballs, druggy hipsters and lovesick aliens with macrocephalic heads? - they decided to form a band, building a musical edifice around them with the finest studio musicians they could find.

When they first started looking for talent, they answered an ad seeking musicians: "No assholes need apply." And as Becker and Fagen didn't think they were assholes, they got in touch. They started recruiting like-minded musicians, and eventually came up with a band who were hired for their musical ability rather than any notions of cool (which Fagen and Becker were convinced they both had in spades). And so two droll East Coast jazz buffs were responsible for creating one of the seminal West Coast rock bands of the early Seventies, an ever-expanding group who would produce some of the decade's most important albums. From 1972's Can't Buy A Thrill and 1973's Countdown To Ecstasy, to 1980's Gaucho, Steely Dan perfectly fused West Coast cool with East Coast cynicism (as someone said recently: the Eagles by Woody Allen). And got away with it: their records sold in their millions.

Musically, they favoured weird key changes, roller-coaster twists and jazz-driven hooks, while their songs were sardonic, sour and full of wit. They were the smartass eggheads of rock, treating Chandleresque or sci-fi scenarios with sophomore black humour. As the New Yorker put it: "The lyrics were generally jaded assessments of young women, the older men who coveted them, and other humans caught at their least flattering moments." Even their moniker was sarcastic, being the name of a dildo in William Burroughs' The Naked Lunch.

Highly metropolitan, they excelled at manipulated isolation, while Fagen and Becker were labelled the most cynical and ferociously intelligent songwriters in the business. "Our music is somehow a little too cheesy at times and turns off the rock intelligentsia for the most part," said Fagen in the mid-Seventies. "At other times it's too bizarre to be appreciated by anybody." Experts said they welded jazz and rock into an alloy so smooth and shiny it was difficult to tell where the one ended and the other began, sneering at the world from a position of bohemian superiority so rarefied it was hard to tell exactly where it was situated.

"We were interested in a kind of hybrid music that included all the music we'd ever listened to," says Fagen. "So there was always a lot of TV music and things in there. It was very eclectic, and it used to make us laugh: we knew something was good if we would really laugh at it when we played it back. We liked the sort of faux-luxe sound of the Fifties, there was just something very funny about it. I grew up in a faux-luxe household, and it was a very alienating world, so for me it has the opposite effect: muzak is supposed to relax you, but it makes me very anxious. So in a way, I think I get it out of me by putting some of it in my songs. Then I start to laugh at it when I hear it."

They were never very good at interviews, or at least couldn't be bothered to hide their disdain for music journalists. During one such encounter, Becker said to the unsuspecting hack: "This is beginning to remind me of the joke where the guy from Oklahoma goes up to a New York cabbie and says, 'Excuse me, could you tell me how I can get to Times Square, or should I just go f*** myself?'"

In a business that largely revolves around communication, both men have taken great delight in being as unengaged as possible.

Fagen and Becker's forte was the intricate nature of their records, and they hated taking their band out on the road, which they saw as an endless litany of musical compromises. So eventually they did what the Beatles did, stopped touring and moved into the recording studio. At the time someone asked Fagen how they had managed it, and he said: "Easy. We fired all the roadies so we couldn't go."

When they returned to the studios in 1979 to recordGaucho, knowing Aja would be a hard act to follow, their obsessions got worse, exacerbated by Becker's substance abuse. Then, in January 1980, Becker's girlfriend died of a drugs overdose, causing him to withdraw from recording even further. Three months later, he was knocked down by a New York cab and hospitalised with fractures to his right leg.

On Gaucho, they were using up to six different rhythm sections for the same song. One of the small army of guitarists called in was Mark Knopfler of Dire Straits. He described the experience as "like getting into a swimming pool with lead weights tied to your boots". Toto drummer Jeff Porcaro, who played on the title track, says that, "From noon till six we'd play the tune over and over and over again, nailing each part. We'd go to dinner and come back and start recording. They made everybody play like their life depended on it. But they weren't gonna keep anything anyone else played that night, no matter how tight it was. All they were going for was the drum track." Fagen was so neurotically perfectionist in the studio that people called him "Mother". (While recording his vocal for "Home At Last", he allegedly spent four whole days punching in the words "Well, the" at the start of the chorus.)

In 1981, shortly after the release of Gaucho - predictably, by far their weakest record - the band fell apart, with Becker skulking off to Hawaii to get rid of his drug habit, and Fagen sloping off to write a solo album. The record that materialised just a year later, The Nightfly, was another masterpiece. A concept album about the golden age of the Fifties, the record was blatantly autobiographical, with many of the songs touching on the tropes and moods of the decade. The "Nightfly" himself was largely based on the DJ Jean Shepherd, along with other broadcasters such as Symphony Sid, Mort Fega and Ed Beach.

"I used to live 50 miles outside New York City in one of those rows of prefab houses," says Fagen. "It was a bland environment. One of my only escapes was late-night radio shows that were broadcast from Manhattan - jazz and rhythm and blues. To me the DJs were romantic and colourful figures and the whole hipster culture of black lifestyles seemed much more vital to a kid living in the suburbs as I was. A lot of kids went through the same thing, although I guess as I listened to jazz I was in a minority. That's why there was an explosion of hipsterism in the Sixties, although it turned into something else."

The album's cover artwork featured Fagen as the Nightfly himself, wearing a suitable collared shirt and tie, speaking into an old-fashioned RCA 77-DX microphone. Ever the stickler, in front of him is a turntable, an ashtray and a pack of Chesterfield Kings cigarettes. On the table you can also see a copy of the 1958 jazz album Sonny Rollins And The Contemporary Leaders. Behind him, the clock says 4:09.

Then, for the next ten years, Fagen appeared to go into therapy, no doubt discussing the writer's block that plagued him for nearly a decade. He dabbled in soundtracks and production, and even started writing a column for a film magazine, but he wouldn't re-emerge properly until another concept album, 1993's sci-fi-tinged Kamakiriad. Here, a Fagen-like protagonist sets out, in his steam-powered Kamakiri car, across an American landscape that's both futuristic and debilitated. The record evoked a De Chirico painting or a Michael Mann film, an aching juxtaposition of hot sun and cool metallic shadows.

Since then, there have been two more Fagen records, and two from a reformed Steely Dan, containing songs which, when jumbled about on an iPod, sound like they were recorded by the same people at the same time.

If The Nightfly was about adolescence, and Kamakiriadabout Fagen's mid-life crisis (albeit filtered through the conceit of science fiction), 2006's Morph The Cat was about mortality. Written in the fallout from 9/11, it was a record full of apprehension.

"I didn't see the actual thing happen, but I was stuck in town for a few days afterwards, because you couldn't leave," says Fagen. "The bridges and tunnels were all secured and there was no traffic. I saw the people walking uptown, trying to get home, and a lot of people covered in soot. There were fighter planes going overhead... Then this huge cloud of smoke downtown started climbing towards the moon. It was very strange. Everyone was in shock. So not only did everything about the town change, you were also seeing it from a shocked perspective... While all the police were downtown, they had these cadets from the police academy, these grey uniforms I'd not seen before, controlling traffic at the big intersections. It was their first chance to exercise power, and I noticed they were kind of bullying people around, which had a real wartime vibe about it."

The album was written in a shroud of paranoia, smack in the middle of the Bush era. "The Clinton era, if it didn't have hope, at least had the illusion of hope," said Fagen at the time. "But I was born into paranoia, I'm a hydrogen-bomb baby, with the air-raid drills and all of that stuff. I grew up with the almost certain expectation of worldwide nuclear war. So I've always felt I was living on borrowed time, I was taught to think that way. Then after the nuclear threat died down, you had the Vietnam war on TV every night. There were a few decades after that when there wasn't that much overtly threatening, but what's happening now is like it's back to living in terror all the time."

The album contains the extraordinary "What I Do", a conversation between a younger Fagen and the ghost of Ray Charles, in which the great pianist advises the lesser on how to emulate his success with the ladies. "I think Ray Charles was one of the most mysterious people ever," says Fagen. "Just watching him, the way his body moves - for a kid from New Jersey to see that kind of passion, that was really revelatory for me. At that point I was living in the suburbs, and even though I was a jazz fan when I was very young, and used to hearing passionate performances on records, the general tendency of jazz in the Fifties was cool, so seeing Ray Charles, who had that much gospel in his style, you could tell he was utterly authentic."

In 1993, having hated the experience the first time around, the band started playing concerts, although I know to my cost that this can be an enervating experience; live the band can come across as self-indulgent and noodly, while the crowd is usually made up of fifty- and sixtysomething men dressed in ill-fitting T-shirts and inappropriate jeans. As for the new records, while they've been good, often as good as the earlier ones, none of them surpass them.

Fagen is a professional grouch, and while he is one of the least high-profile grumpy old rock stars still treading the boards, his Eeyore-ish tendencies are famous in the industry. He is not what you would call loosey-goosey, and in recent years has been described as behaving like a college professor trying to get fired.

"I basically listen to the same 40 albums that I listened to in high school," he says. "I had much better taste then. I was a kid jazz fan. I only like seven or eight of the greatest artists: Sonny Rollins, Charles Mingus, Miles Davis, Thelonious Monk... And I like big-band arrangers, like Gil Evans. There's a band called the Sauter-Finegan Orchestra that I used to like for the arrangements."

Last year, Fagen became a bona fide author, albeit tentatively, with his memoir, Eminent Hipsters. As an eminent hipster himself, Fagen is more than adequately qualified to write about cool, although the book was a lot less expansive than it could have been.

The first half of the book is a collection of portraits of the cultural figures who influenced Fagen growing up in New Jersey in the early Sixties, including Jean Shepherd, composers Henry Mancini and Ennio Morricone, and Ray Charles. The second half of the book is a kind of geriatric Diary Of A Rock'n'Roll Star, and catalogues in exhaustive detail the trials and tribulations of touring in your sixties.

As you would expect from someone who has been one of the most consistently mordant voices in rock, Fagen can write. Here he is describing Blake Edwards' TV detective series, Peter Gunn: "Edwards' camera eye seemed to take a carnal interest in the luxe and leisure objects of the period, focusing on the Scandinavian furniture, potted palms, light wood panelling and sleek shark-finned convertibles. It was, in fact, all the same stuff my parents adored, but darkened with a tablespoon of alienation and danger. Sort of like seeing a smiling Pan Am pilot climb out of his 707 with a copy of La Nausée sticking out of his back pocket."

Eminent Hipsters is full of such gems, although for those who have silently worshipped Fagen from afar for too, too many years, perhaps he could have dug a little deeper into his psyche, and described some of the personal and professional motivations that have contributed to one of the most ­important and influential bodies of work in all pop.

But then perhaps that wouldn't have been cool.

http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/comment/articles/2014-02/12-/donald-fagen-steely-dan-aja

Thursday, 16 October 2014

Last night's set lists

At The Habit, York: -

Ron Elderly: -
You Better Move On
Love Is The Drug
Waggon Wheel

Da Elderly: -
Mellow My Mind
Human Highway
One Of These Days

The Elderly Brothers: -
The Price Of Love
If Not For You
I'm Into Something Good
Don't Throw Your Love Away
You Got It

Much busier than last week and some new faces at the mic made for an enjoyable evening. We were treated to songs guaranteed to entertain any prospective Friday Boy, including All Along The Watchtower and Ashes To Ashes. The Elderlys closed the night and included a 'new' Searchers hit.

The Beach Boys 101


A beginner’s guide to the sweet, stinging nostalgia of The Beach Boys

Noel Murray
16 Oct 2014

Primer is The A.V. Club’s ongoing series of beginner’s guides to pop culture’s most notable subjects: filmmakers, music styles, literary genres, and whatever else interests us—and hopefully you. This installment: The Beach Boys

The Beach Boys 101

The craft of pop music is all about exploiting trends; the art of pop music is about exploiting popularity. This is the story of The Beach Boys. In the band’s early days, Brian Wilson and his brothers Dennis and Carl—joined by their cousin Mike Love, and pushed by their father Murry—capitalized on the surfing craze in Southern California, selling a lifestyle of big waves, boss cars, and pretty girls, first to the rest of the United States and then to the world. Once they were established as a novelty act, The Beach Boys matured, as Brian Wilson took advantage of the band’s huge fan base to experiment with more complicated arrangements and emotions, mixing some clouds in with the sun.

There are Beach Boys fans who only like the simpler, shallower early songs; and there are Beach Boys fans who hardly ever listen to anything the band recorded prior to 1966. That split is mirrored within the group itself; Brian Wilson and Mike Love have differed over the decades on what The Beach Boys should be. Over the years, Love has been largely responsible for keeping The Beach Boys alive, touring the nostalgia circuit and putting new albums out during the years a mentally struggling Wilson either couldn’t perform at all or could only produce strange, half-realized songs. Yet for many hardcore Beach Boys devotees Wilson is the band, because even at their oddest, his songs are graced with genius.

The one project that unites the two Beach Boys camps—and even some people who haven’t listened to much else the band has done—is 1966’s Pet Sounds, which routinely lands near the top of any list of the all-time greatest rock ’n’ roll albums. Considered an expensive flop at the time, Pet Sounds’ reputation turned around fairly quickly once it became clear the record wasn’t an aberration, either in pop music (with its lush, baroque orchestrations becoming the model for hundreds of ambitious late-’60s 45s and LPs) or in the career of The Beach Boys (who’d spend much of the next half-decade trying to match it).

Brian Wilson never meant Pet Sounds to be “difficult.” He saw himself as competing with The Beatles—whose Rubber Soul had set a new standard for how to construct a pop album—by treating each song as a potential mini-masterpiece. Pet Sounds’ conceptual coup is the way Wilson appropriates the style of his parents’ generation—the lavish, gliding sound of “dinner music”—and uses it to score songs about lovesick, moony-eyed young people. Some of the earliest Beach Boys songs gave an impression of Brian Wilson as a man who was old before his time, already pining for a vanished past. With the Pet Sounds songs “I Just Wasn’t Made For These Times” and “Let’s Go Away For Awhile,” Wilson made those feelings of displacement plainer, lending a deep melancholy to the album that echoed across lilting ballads like “God Only Knows” and “Caroline, No.” Pet Sounds was a Top 10 album, with two Top 10 singles—“Wouldn’t It Be Nice” and a cover of the folk standard “Sloop John B”—but the un-hip orchestrations and pervasive sadness baffled some longtime fans, who didn’t immediately get what Wilson was trying to do.

One big reason why the perception of Pet Sounds turned around is that The Beach Boys followed it up with their most popular song ever, “Good Vibrations,” a dizzying collage of musical fragments and allusive lyrics that works like a summary (and summery) statement of The Beach Boys’ discography up to that point. Heavier rock musicians in the late ’60s and early ’70s tried to class up the genre by fusing rock with classical music, but Brian Wilson and Mike Love made that leap more intuitively and inventively, creating what their publicists dubbed “a pocket symphony.” There’s simply no precedent for “Good Vibrations,” which sounds like Wilson stripping the backing tracks from two dozen old Beach Boys songs and then treating those parts like instruments in an orchestra, to be conducted on the fly. “Good Vibrations” is also the most purely exultant song The Beach Boys ever recorded—a dose of concentrated joy that satisfied both Wilson’s and Love’s visions for the band. The song has the tight, high harmonies and California fantasy imagery they were known for, but it’s also experimental and expressionistic, externalizing the riot of colors and emotions in Brian Wilson’s head.

More confident than ever that he was on the right track, Wilson got together with his new friend Van Dyke Parks, aiming to make a whole album as inspired as “Good Vibrations.” That project, called Smile, was going to tell the story of America, and encompass the full range of popular music, all while trying to recapture the innocence and playfulness of childhood. But Wilson’s reach exceeded his grasp, and his worsening mental state—combined with pressure from his bandmates to capitalize more quickly on the success of “Good Vibrations” before the fickle record-buying public moved on—led Wilson to scrap Smile before he could finish it. This would be the start of a rough patch for Wilson, as the stigma of an unfinished masterpiece and an overall hardening of rock music fed his anxiety.

Songs from Smile would trickle out onto other Beach Boys albums over the next several years, and in the ’70s some fans took those songs, along with some rescued Smile outtakes, and reconstructed fantasy versions of the album on bootlegs. Finally, in 2004, a healthier Wilson started performing Smile in concert, and recorded a new version called Brian Wilson Presents Smile. Then in 2011, The Beach Boys put out The Smile Sessions, featuring new mixes of the old recordings, sequenced to match what Wilson had been performing.

People inside The Beach Boys camp are quick to note that neither Wilson’s solo album nor The Smile Sessions are “the real Smile.” That album has never existed, because right up to the moment that he abandoned the project, Wilson was still debating how he wanted to present the songs; he was considering a more groundbreaking approach that would split some of them into fragments and weave them together, more like a proper suite. (Beach Boys connoisseurs looking for glimmers of the more freeform Smile cherish some of the raw tracking sessions, collected on various box sets and reissues, which show Wilson working in the moment with studio-trained musicians to try out different variations on the same passages.) But even the approximate Smile is brilliant, with a wider variety of moods and approaches than Pet Sounds, and with lyrics that weave together a set of loosely connected ideas about health, happiness, and history. Wilson and Parks aimed to reach listeners on a subconscious level, with lyrics like “the child is the father of the man” that seem opaque at first, but profound when paired with the eruptive, chiming music.

Of the albums produced in the wake of Smile (or at least the ones that draw the most on the work Wilson did on that record), the two most essential are 1967’s Smiley Smile and 1971’s Surf’s Up. The former was an attempt to salvagesomething from the Smile sessions, by taking two of its anchor songs—“Heroes And Villains” and “Good Vibrations”—throwing in a few more Wilson oddities like “Vegetables” and “She’s Goin’ Bald,” and stitching the whole thing together with Smile esoterica. The album is too short, and only hints at what Smile was supposed to be, but the music on Smiley Smile is still some of the most sublime The Beach Boys ever recorded, even when packaged more as a psychedelic snack than as the rich brain-food Wilson intended.

As for Surf’s Up, it’s the transitional album between the Pet Sounds/Smile era and the more mainstream rock that The Beach Boys attempted in the early ’70s. The record’s big selling point is the title track, which is one of Smile’s key songs, and as perfect an example of Brian Wilson’s genius as “Good Vibrations.” At once elegiac and hopeful, “Surf’s Up” bids farewell to the past with a sense of yearning and purpose. And even though the morbid (yet strangely calming) “’Til I Die” is the only other major Brian Wilson song on the album—and even though Surf’s Up is marred by the awful Mike Love song “Student Demonstration Time”—the record as a whole matches the mood of its title track, highlighted by off-and-on Beach Boy Bruce Johnston’s sweetly swaying “Disney Girls (1957),” and two of Carl Wilson’s best songs, “Long Promised Road” and “Feel Flows.”

Between those two albums, The Beach Boys made 1968’s lovely Friends, which splits the difference between the two records, mixing the lazy-day lyrics ofSmile with the tighter arrangements and focus of Surf’s Up. Even though the songs are so short that the whole album is over and done in the time it would take to self-medicate properly, Friends’ paeans to transcendentalism, having kids, and “doin’ nothin’” make it one of The Beach Boys’ warmest and most spiritual records. (Plus, without the lush instrumentals “Passing By” and “Diamond Head,” The High Llamas probably wouldn’t exist.)

Two years after Surf’s Up, the band put out an album just as good: 1973’s Holland, recorded in Amsterdam with major contributions from guitarist Blondie Chaplin and drummer Ricky Fataar, two South African musicians who’d joined the band in 1972—in part to help cover for absent members, and in part to help update The Beach Boys’ sound to something more relevant to the country-rock jams and prog-rock experiments of the early ’70s. Hollandsounds refreshingly contemporary, from the steel guitars and harmonicas to the spoken-word interlude in the environmentalist trilogy “California Saga.” It also sounds like a Beach Boys album. It’s not just the rollicking Brian Wilson song “Sail On, Sailor” that shines like The Beach Boys of old. Fataar and Chaplin’s poignant ballad “Leavin’ This Town” sounds like a Jackson Browne interpretation of a Pet Sounds track, while Carl Wilson’s two-part “The Trader” applies brother Brian’s Smile lessons about sonic fragmentation to the kind of literate character sketch that confessional singer-songwriters up and down the West Coast were attempting at the time. Major rock and pop stars of the early ’70s like Browne, Neil Young, and Chicago all claimed The Beach Boys as a major influence. Holland took back what those acts had borrowed.

Holland marked the beginning of a commercial turnaround for The Beach Boys—one at first mild, then phenomenal. The record drew good reviews and sold decently, and was outpaced later that same year by a live double-LP. And then in 1974, Capitol Records repackaged the band’s biggest pre-Pet Sounds hits onto a double-album called Endless Summer, with a colorful, modern-looking cover. Arriving just as America was getting nostalgia-happy—around the time of Sha Na Na, American Graffiti, and Happy Days—Endless Summerbecame a massive hit, spawning a 1975 sequel Spirit Of America that also did well. Given the spottiness of a lot of the records The Beach Boys released in the early ’60s, Endless Summer makes the best case for what the band was up to before Brian Wilson went arty.

The Beach Boys got a similar commercial boost in the wake of the initially modest reaction to Pet Sounds by releasing a trio of The Best Of The Beach Boys albums between 1966 and 1968. Later, more comprehensive anthologies (likeEndless Summer and Spirit Of America) have rendered these records irrelevant, but in and of themselves, they’re well-sequenced collections full of classic songs, and worth buying if they turn up in the used-vinyl racks. Another one to seek out is one of the odder of the Beach Boys compilations from the late ’60s: 1968’s Stack-O-Tracks, which collects the instrumental backing tracks from Beach Boys hits for fans to sing along to. The songs don’t sound quite right without the harmonies, but at least Stack-O-Tracks allows them to be heard in an entirely new way, calling attention to the band’s oft-underrated musicianship.

For those who can’t abide greatest-hits collections but still want to give the early Beach Boys their due, some of the earlier albums are better than others. The band’s third album, 1963’s Surfer Girl, was their first wholly produced by Brian Wilson, and already Wilson was trying to make his songs less one-note, as evidenced by the dreamy title track, the layered “Catch A Wave,” and the gorgeous “In My Room” (a surprisingly early peek into Wilson’s future insularity). In 1964, when The Beach Boys were trying to add a gearhead element to their repertoire, they released Shut Down Volume 2, which supplements catchy car tunes like “Fun, Fun, Fun” and “Shut Down” with two more of Wilson’s best early “all grown up” songs, “Don’t Worry Baby” and “The Warmth Of The Sun.” And 1964’s All Summer Long serves as a poignant farewell to frivolity, taking its cues from the title track’s litany of what was, and running that same vibe through songs like romantic lament “Wendy” and the defiant “Little Honda.”

Intermediate Work

The Beach Boys’ transition from teenage kicks to the adult ache of Pet Sounds began in 1965, and especially with the album Summer Days (And Summer Nights!!), which puts more emphasis on the latter than the former. Like the previous year’s All Summer Long, Summer Days (And Summer Nights!!) is predominately an after-sunset, past-tense kind of record, with songs like “Girl Don’t Tell Me,” “Help Me, Rhonda,” and “Let Him Run Wild” all sporting strong overtones of despair. The album’s biggest hit, “California Girls,” applies the complex, curveball-filled arrangement that would later distinguish songs like “Wouldn’t It Be Nice” and “Good Vibrations” to what seems like a return to The Beach Boys’ novelty days, but is actually an example of Wilson creating an idealized reality to escape the stresses of his own life.

Post Pet Sounds/Smile, The Beach Boys scrambled to work around Brian Wilson’s eccentricities and to keep up with a rapidly evolving rock scene by releasing albums that fit Wilson’s sometimes-bizarre, sometimes-magnificent songs between hippie rhapsodies and throwback pop. Smiley Smile and Surf’s Up are the solid bookends of this era, with Friends as the whimsical centerpiece, but the three other late-’60s Beach Boys albums—1967’s Wild Honey, 1969’s 20/20, and 1970’s Sunflower—all hit some astonishing highs, and are all fairly cohesive, with not too many outright clunkers. Wild Honey is a back-to-basics record, leaving Smile’s freakiness behind and getting back into a groove, with stripped-down retro rock songs like “Darlin’” and  “Here Comes The Night” alternating with pretty, Bacharach-inspired tracks like “Aren’t You Glad” and “Let The Wind Blow.” As with the same year’s Smiley Smile, it’s too slight, but it’s also enjoyably high-spirited and hokey. (If The Beach Boys could’ve waited and combined those two albums, which together are only 50 minutes long, they might’ve quieted the dismissive rock critics of that era.)

20/20 is more scattershot, due mainly to Brian Wilson being institutionalized during much of its recording. But the album does salvage one of the best Smilesongs, “Cabinessence,” adds a new Beach Boys classic in “Do It Again,” and spotlights the work of Carl and Dennis Wilson, laying the groundwork for where The Beach Boys would go in the early ’70s. Sunflower, on the other hand, is the closest thing to a real, full album the band had recorded since Pet Sounds. Recording for a new label, Reprise Records, The Beach Boys put out a record that ran a relatively generous 36 minutes, and one that sounded unified—even though, like its predecessor, Sunflower contains contributions from everyone in the band, with a good number of songs by Dennis. Anchored by the single “Add Some Music To Your Day,” Sunflower is like the band’s answer to the wave of “sunshine pop” and “bubblegum” acts that had emerged over the previous couple of years, showing that no one could write and record slick, melodic, harmony-drenched songs quite like The Beach Boys, who knew how to add a layer of reflectiveness to chipper songs like “Deirdre” and “This Whole World.” (Plus, with Sunflower’s closing song, “Cool, Cool Water,” Brian Wilson and Mike Love turned a Smile-era throwaway into something textured and casually profound.)

None of the post-Pet Sounds Beach Boys albums were hits, but the success of Endless Summer made the band wildly popular again, and Brian Wilson’s controversial new therapist Eugene Landy (whom Brian would later sue for exerting too much control over his life) convinced him that it’d be good for his mental health to start reengaging with the band again by touring and recording. The other Beach Boys had mixed feelings about the new arrangement. Mike Love saw the publicity upside in having Brian back in the fold, working a new album, striking while The Beach Boys were a hot commodity. Carl and Dennis weren’t as keen on ceding so much of the creative control they’d had in the early ’70s back to Brian—especially given Brian didn’t seem all that interested in making a proper Beach Boys album, preferring instead to record a set of corny, off-the-cuff rock and pop covers. As it happened, everyone was a little bit right about the 1976 album 15 Big Ones(which was named both for its number of songs and for the band being 15 years old). Carl and Dennis were right that 15 Big Ones wasn’t daring enough for the band’s first album of new material in three years. Yet the record’s mix of Brian’s favorite oldies and a handful of nutty new ones—including the delightful “Had To Phone Ya” and “That Same Song”—is fun, in a low-stakes way. And Love’s instincts were spot-on: 15 Big Ones sold better than any new Beach Boys album had all decade. (It may have helped that the generic title and cover art made 15 Big Ones look like another hits collection.)

By the mid-1970s, there were effectively two bands calling themselves “The Beach Boys”: one led by Mike Love, who was more than willing to sing “I Get Around” for complacent baby-boomers for the rest of his life, and the other led by Brian Wilson, who was trying to process beach culture as deeply personal abstract art. Very early on, Wilson gave up touring to focus on songwriting and recording, which allowed Love to create this alternate version of The Beach Boys. But to Love’s credit, he helped hone the live act into an impressive and popular concert attraction. And there are a few worthy documents of this “good times, great oldies” Beach Boys, including 1964’s Beach Boys Concert(recorded when Wilson was still playing live, and featuring covers of the goofy hits “Monster Mash,” “Papa-Oom-Mow-Mow,” and “The Little Old Lady From Pasadena”), 1970’s Live In London (featuring rocked-up takes on the post-Pet Sounds songs), and 1973’s excellent double-album The Beach Boys In Concert(which sets the outstanding new early-’70s songs side by side with the classics, making them all sound more of a piece).

Advanced Studies

Because The Beach Boys were perceived in their early years as a here-and-gone proposition—like pretty much every other pop, rock, and R&B group—their label, Capitol Records, tried to generate as much product as it could, as quickly as it could. The first few years of The Beach Boys discography are littered with filler-heavy albums and repackagings of the same songs. Records like the 1962 debut album Surfin’ Safari, 1963’s Surfin’ U.S.A., and 1963’s Little Deuce Coupe are primarily only of historical interest now, because their best songs are available in much better anthology packages—and because anyone who wants to hear the kind of tame covers and oddball spoken-word pieces that padded out the early Beach Boys LPs is better off buying Surfer Girl and Shut Down Volume 2.

That said, some of the cash-in albums released during the band’s 1960s heyday have become fan favorites. While 1964’s The Beach Boys’ Christmas Album isn’t a masterpiece on the order of Phil Spector’s A Christmas Gift For You, like Spector’s record it does successfully put youthful rock ’n’ roll in the context of old-fashioned holiday pop music and carols. (Plus, it contains “Little Saint Nick,” a spin on “Little Deuce Coupe” that’s even catchier.) Even more delightful is 1965’s Beach Boys’ Party!, a set of left-field retreads and covers—including three Beatles songs and one from Bob Dylan—played on acoustic instruments and arranged to sound like they’re being played live in a living room while the band’s friends chat and drink in the background. Though faked, the “impromptu” sound of the Party! album feels of a piece with the early Beach Boys’ albums’ evocations of laid-back California fun.

Party! capped a busy (and exclamation-point-filled!) 1965 for The Beach Boys, coming right after Summer Days (And Summer Nights!!) and The Beach Boys Today! For those devoted to the early sun-sand-surf Beach Boys, Today! is a neglected gem, full of great songs like “Dance, Dance, Dance” and “When I Grow Up (To Be A Man)” that are often left off the hits collections. It’s more uniformly upbeat in contrast to what came immediately after—with fairly simple rock arrangements and a minimum of melancholy—but as with the Christmas album, Today! is both an enjoyable record and a valuable look at The Beach Boys at the height of their commercial powers, competing aggressively with both the British Invasion and Spector’s signature sound: teen-friendly, operatic R&B.

Similarly, 1972’s funkily-titled Carl And The Passions – “So Tough” is an outstanding document of the Beach Boys era when Carl and Dennis were steering the boat. The first album to feature Fataar and Chaplin as full-time band members, Carl And The Passions is like a running start at Holland; it’s a solid ’70s West Coast rock album in and of itself, even if at times—as on the Fataar/Chaplin composition “Here She Comes”—it barely sounds like The Beach Boys. The title implies some sort of ’50s tribute, but Carl And The Passionsis more in the mode of laid-back country-rock, with a few progressive elements, like something Poco or Stephen Stills would’ve made at the time. This is Carl and Dennis reimagining what The Beach Boys could be—and quite well, as the superior Holland would prove one year later. (For those primarily interested in what Brian was up to at the time, the most relevant parts of Carl And The Passions are the dense, gospel-tinged “He Come Down” and the exuberant, quirky “Marcella.”)

There are some Beach Boys fans who prefer the Carl/Dennis age, and think The Cult Of Brian Wilson permanently damaged what could’ve remained a fine mainstream rock band. For them, 1977’s Love You is Exhibit A in what happened when the band let Brian dominate. For Brian-ologists, though, Love You is one of the great crack-up albums of the ’70s, in the same vein as Neil Young’s Tonight’s The Night, Harry Nilsson’s Pussy Cats, and Syd Barrett’s The Madcap Laughs and Barrett. Love You started out as a true Brian Wilson solo album, with Wilson using a synthesizer to replicate his grand orchestras of the ’60s. He eventually allowed his Beach Boys bandmates to contribute vocals and ideas, but Love You would remain the purest expression of what had been swimming around in Wilson’s brain since Smile. Crippling self-doubt, drilled into Brian by a reportedly abusive father and the fickle fluctuations of public approval, left him trying to use music as a balm. So there’s something almost desperately optimistic about Love You, as Wilson sings frayed songs about roller-skating, road-tripping, and Johnny Carson—like a frazzled man sitting in a corner chanting “calm blue ocean” over and over. It’s a beautiful, noisy, funny, heartbreaking work of art—one not for everybody, yet vital for anyone who wants to understand Wilson’s overall worldview.

Brian Wilson wanted to build off of the creative breakthrough of Love You, but the record industry was less enthusiastic. So The Beach Boys albums that followed over the next decade featured only token input from Brian as a songwriter and a vocalist—and as a result are mostly abysmal. (It didn’t help that Dennis and Carl largely checked out, too, or that the band as a whole was devastated by Dennis’ death by drowning in 1983.) There’s absolutely no reason to bother with anything bearing The Beach Boys name that came out between 1980 and 1992—at a time when outside producers, drum machines, self-parody, and the ever-present threat of “Kokomo” made listening even to Brian Wilson-penned songs a depressing experience. That said, the last two 1970s Beach Boys records actually aren’t that bad. M.I.U. Album, released in 1978, and 1979’s L.A. (Light Album) both go down smooth, putting the band’s classic harmonies in the context of the late-’70’s radio featuring the Grease soundtrack and Captain & Tennille. M.I.U. is the more seamless of the two—for better and worse—while L.A. has a few memorable wrinkles, including one truly great Dennis Wilson song, “Love Surrounds Me,” and a passable 11-minute disco version of “Here Comes The Night,” engineered by Brian Wilson’s best sunshine-pop disciple, Curt Boettcher.

After the revival of Smile in the 2000s, Wilson reunited with Love, Johnston, Al Jardine, and long-ago Beach Boy David Marks for a 50th anniversary tour, and paired it with a new album, That’s Why God Made The Radio, consisting partly of songs Wilson had written over the years and set aside for the band, just in case a reunion ever occurred. Far from an afterthought, That’s Why God Made The Radio is a fully realized Beach Boys record, produced by Wilson with nearly the same level of orchestration he brought to the late-’60s albums. And while the material is hit-and-miss, songs like the title track and the album-closing “Summer’s Gone” have all the yearning and rich harmonics of The Beach Boys of yore.

Miscellany

With Brian Wilson either absent or uncooperative in the latter half of the ’70s (and much of the decade beyond), the main Beach Boys tried their hands at solo albums, with decent results. Even Mike Love’s hilariously titled 1981 solo debut Looking Back With Love is unexpectedly charming, thanks in large part to producer Curt Boettcher’s clean integration of synthesizers into a set of lively, heartfelt pop songs. Carl Wilson’s own 1981 solo debut, Carl Wilson, and his 1983 follow-up Youngblood aren’t as much of a treat, because Carl’s songwriting is more somber and less catchy, which doesn’t mesh as well with the more club-footed ’80s production styles. Still, both albums offer a little closure for fans who enjoyed the sophisticated country-rock direction that Carl was pushing The Beach Boys toward in the early ’70s.

But the two best Beach Boys solo albums came from Brian and Dennis. Brian Wilson’s 1988 LP Brian Wilson is as synth-heavy and booming as The Beach Boys’ albums at the time, but the songs are terrific—especially the opening track, “Love And Mercy”—and Wilson seems to be having a ball, hearkening back to his classic Pet Sounds sound. (Later Wilson solo albums, likeImagination, Gettin’ In Over My Head, and That Lucky Old Sun, come across as tame and a little sterile, though each has flashes of greatness.) And Dennis Wilson’s 1977 record Pacific Ocean Blue is a wonder: a thoughtful and surprising refashioning of various kinds of American roots music to suit Dennis’ dark, sweet rasp. The songs are dramatic, and creatively presented, with as much of Dennis’ personality as his older brother’s freewheeling explorations of self.

Though it’s not a proper Brian Wilson solo album, 1995’s I Just Wasn’t Made For These Times is a strong collection of demos and new recordings of older songs, in support of Don Was’ moving documentary about Wilson’s life and personal troubles. (For fervent Beach Boys fans, these kinds of behind-the-scenes stories are important to understanding where the music came from.) And while it’s a marginal entry into The Beach Boys’ discography, the 1996 project Stars And Stripes, Vol. 1—which saw country stars singing Beach Boys classics, documented in the film Beach Boys: Nashville Sounds—did feature Brian Wilson’s first serious involvement with the band since the ’70s, as he stepped back behind the board as a co-producer. There are some really nice performances on Stars And Stripes, too, including Willie Nelson singing “The Warmth Of The Sun” and Timothy B. Schmit doing “Caroline, No.” The Beach Boys have a singular sound, but covers like these reveal how the songs can stand up to different interpretations, because they were always meant to be part of a larger pop music tradition.

The Essentials

1. The Smile Sessions
2. Pet Sounds
3. Holland
4. Friends
5. Love You

http://www.avclub.com/article/beginners-guide-sweet-stinging-nostalgia-beach-boy-210390

Coupla points:

a) David Marks, Al Jardine and Bruce Johnston need a little more air-time
b) The article woefully undersells Today, side two of which is a pre-Pet Sounds gem

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

Night of the Eagle - Sidney Hayers (1962)


Why I love... Night of the Eagle
Creepy 1962 witchcraft thriller Night of the Eagle anticipates Rosemary’s Baby and The Stepford Wives in its story of dark forces at work in middle-class suburbia.

Josephine Botting
20 November 2013

Growing up with a fascination for the macabre, I sat up alone watching every horror film that turned up on late night TV. My education included the Universal horrors of the 1930s and 40s and Jacques Tourneur’s haunting collaborations with producer Val Lewton. But it came as a revelation to discover that not all tales of horror are set in some vague eastern European locale or on a remote exotic island, and they could be even more frightening when they take place in your own backyard.

British films like Village of the Damned (1960), Quatermass and the Pit (1967) and the portmanteau offerings from Amicus had a special resonance, bringing the alien and supernatural closer to home, even into the home.

Freud developed the notion of the ‘unheimlich’ as a source of fear: something uncanny or ‘unhomely’ – the familiar made strange. What could be more ‘unhomely’ than a suburban British housewife who dismembers her obsessive husband (The Vault of Horror, 1973) or a spaceship full of giant insects uncovered in a disused underground station (Quatermass and the Pit). Or ambitious college wives practising voodoo to further their husbands’ careers, as in the 1962 British film Night of the Eagle.

Perhaps we should call the film ‘suburban gothic‘ – the representation of middle-class neighbourhoods as a hotbed of frustration, rivalry and fear. Based on the American story ‘Conjure Wife’ by Fritz Leiber, Night of the Eagle relocates the narrative to Britain, although with several American actors thrown in, presumably to boost US sales.

As in Night of the Demon, Jacques Tourneur’s 1957 exploration of the dark arts, the film tells of a no-nonsense academic who resolutely denies the existence of witchcraft. Norman Taylor (Peter Wyngarde) is a very successful psychology professor at Hempwell Medical College who is first seen telling his class that superstition is nonsense. So he is furious when he discovers his wife Tansy’s ‘protections’ all over the house.

These black magic accoutrements – a dead spider, an animal skull, graveyard earth – were acquired from a witch-doctor while living in Jamaica. Norman, convinced that all such beliefs are a form of neurosis, forces Tansy to throw the tricks of her trade into the fire, where they sizzle suggestively as she looks on, petrified. From then on, his luck begins to turn.

The film is something of a slow burner until this moment but suddenly sinister occurrences come thick and fast. Yet even after a close shave with a van, an accusation of rape and an unearthly visitation, Norman refuses to abandon his rationality. It isn’t until the giant stone statue over the college entrance fulfils the title’s promise that he finally believes.

Peter Wyngarde’s performance in this sequence is spectacular, his whole body conveying sheer terror as he is pursued through the deserted corridors of the college. He ends up in his own classroom, where the phrase “I do not believe”, written by him at the film’s start, is still chalked mockingly on the blackboard.

Wyngarde was a well-established TV actor and already had horror credentials before appearing in this British classic, delivering more than a few shocks as the ghostly presence of Peter Quint in Jack Clayton’s The Innocents (1961). Here, in his first leading role on the big screen, his striking clean-cut looks and slender stature made him perfect casting as the high-flying academic who undergoes a psychological overhaul.

The screenplay couldn’t have been in better hands: credit goes to Richard Matheson and Charles Beaumont, two eminent sci-fi writers who contributed to TV series The Twilight Zone, and crime writer George Baxt (The City of the Dead, The Shadow of the Cat). The script is cleverly peppered with sly allusions to superstition and witchcraft: “Have you sold your soul to the Devil?” one of Norman’s colleagues asks jokingly, eliciting nervous glances from his wife; after Norman crashes his car, he regains consciousness to see the St Christopher’s medal of the other driver dangling tauntingly before his eyes.

Director Sidney Hayers uses an array of techniques to enhance the chilling effect. The sound design is skilful, in particular the use of a reel-to-reel tape containing Norman’s speech on neurosis to conjure up evil – modern technology employed for ancient ends. Black-and-white cinematography is the purest way to portray the battle against dark forces, and much of the action takes place in Norman and Tansy’s house, amplifying their isolation and vulnerability.

In Night of the Eagle, middle-class homes and communities cease to be places of comfort and security; the film further paved the way for later domestic revelations such as Rosemary’s Baby (1968) and The Stepford Wives (1974). So beware – those twitching curtains can harbour more than just nosey neighbours.

http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/features/why-i-love-night-eagle

Monday, 13 October 2014

Hugo Williams - I Knew the Bride review


Hugo Williams's new poems confirm his national-treasure status
A review of ‘I Knew the Bride’, by Hugo Williams. A marvellous, memorious collection drawn to the second world war and family heartache

Karl Miller
20 September 2014

I Knew the Bride Hugo Williams
Faber, pp.80, £12.99, ISBN: 978057130888

Around 1960, I went to work with the literary staff of The Spectator, where I was followed, in a later world, by the poet and diarist Hugo Williams. At this early stage it was possible to feel close to the family that could be inferred from his poems: a mother and a film-star father injured in the war, two brothers, a sister. He was thought, from school onward, to be a member of thejeunesse dorée. His satires could look as if they had issued from the Albany, or other Regency revival buildings. His poems were recognised from the first as elegant and intelligent. Many of them were poems that good manners might write.

It would be silly, of course, to go on as if he were a gentleman rather than a poet, a refugee from a Wilde matinĂ©e, but it is nonetheless possible to suppose that his class meant something to his verse, that of a somewhat specialised democrat at times. Let it be said that his activities as a poetry editor, searching for and refusing people’s offerings, were the work of a working man.

I Knew the Bride is a marvellous, memorious collection, once it moves away from the cryptic poems of the early pages. It’s an abstemious collection which is drawn to second world wartime and which sets you down with an aeronautical dump or threat:

A wartime section with sandbags,
gas masks, love letters, lipstick,
an air-raid shelter
with corrugated iron roof,
blackouts, searchlights, adultery,
the King and Queen to the rescue:
blood, sweat and Bovril.
We exit through a luminous arch
set in a mushroom cloud

One of his most heart-rending poems is the elegy for his sister Polly (1950–2004) in memory of what happened when the children were small; Polly was teased and chased in the usual way and it may be that the poem (perfectly judged, not a foot wrong) has a measure of contrition in it:

You fought a five-year war
with that foul thing
which deals in hope and fear,
two against one,
like the brothers who tormented you

The development of the siblings’ relationship gives the structure of the poem; the ragging of the fairytale princess ends in witnessing Polly’s back-parting swept into the flames of a cremation.

A separate sequence of poems on his time (still unexpired) in the dialysis ward of a London hospital follows the Polly poem. The description of processing is plain and factual: a flash of needles, a worshipped Indian nurse, a Dickensian grotesque. The simplest words often turn out to be among the best:

They always ask you how you are
when you arrive,
but they know already of course.

It’s pretty obvious
from the pleading look on your faces
and your dialysis tan
That you’re a regular here
and it doesn’t do
to say you feel terrible
You’re lucky to be alive,
but you don’t see it like that.
You think you’re being brave.

The people are in the ward to have their blood washed and decanted, and a kidney sought.

Not long ago a doctor rang him in the middle of the night at his home (home-executed dialysis had been mooted) and asked him to come in for examination and to be confronted by a new possible donor. Hugo was not successful.

The poems in the new collection seal his claim to be thought a distinguished and endearing poet, while his hospital poems rate as a great human achievement. It is a pleasure to speak well of Hugo’s work: the sensation may date back to the days when it could be felt by some that there was a need for kind words and protection. He is now a national treasure more than a protected species, and I hope I haven’t been grovelling here. Not that he would have noticed, perhaps. He is less dependent on praise than most writers, while as much as ever, in the new book, deserving it.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/books/9315152/i-knew-the-bride-by-hugo-williams-review/

Sunday, 12 October 2014

David Lynch and Mark Frost return to Twin Peaks


David Lynch: surreal purveyor of the evil that lurks within
He directed Eraserhead and Blue Velvet, but it was the dark and quirky TV series Twin Peaks that made his name. Now, 25 years later, he is back. Just don’t try to predict the outcome

Andrew Anthony
The Observer
Sunday 12 October 2014

Last year, the celebrated American film maker David Lynch expressed the view that “television is way more interesting than cinema now… it seems art house has gone to cable”. Just last week it was announced that Lynch, the one-time prince of the art house, is heading the same way.

He and Mark Frost are to reprise their hit 1990 TV series Twin Peaks for the cable company Showtime. Almost a quarter of a century ago, Lynch effectively told television viewers to wake up and smell the “damn fine coffee”.

When Twin Peaks first aired, American TV was a creative wasteland where only the most unbending formats thrived. No one was quite sure what to make of this new series about the killing of a teenage girl in a small northwestern community. Was it a soap opera, a whodunnit or a supernatural thriller?

In fact, it was a surreal mixture of them all, at once as familiar as cherry pie and as unsettling as a bad dream. More than that, it was appointment television that, out of nowhere, radically expanded the possibilities of the small screen.
[vlcsnap-8369.png]
In the intervening years, American television has grown much bolder and more ambitious, creating such powerful and complex series as The Sopranos and The Wire, while Lynch has slipped back into the experimental margins from which he emerged.

But Lynch left his mark. Series such as the recent True Detective positively hum with Lynchian foreboding and without his distinctive take on the everyday macabre, it’s hard to imagine that Six Feet Under would have been made. Nor, perhaps, an open-ended mystery such as Lost, although we shouldn’t hold that against him.

So the return to TV seems like poetic justice. Not just because Lynch did so much to revive a moribund medium, but also because first time round control was wrested from his grasp and, like countless other film-makers before him, he fell victim to the pressures and machinations of network television.

The original two series focused on the murder of Laura Palmer in the fictional Washington town of Twin Peaks. The investigation was led by special agent Dale Cooper (Kyle MacLachlan) who had a thing for a “damn fine cup of coffee”. At first, it was utterly beguiling and then a little infuriating, at which point ABC insisted that the identity of the murderer be revealed half way through the second series.

As a result, the show stumbled unhappily and increasingly unwatched towards cancellation. This time round things will be different. There are only nine episodes, written by Frost and Lynch, set in the present day, and Lynch will direct all of them, which are due to be broadcast in 2016. There is also a promise from Showtime that outstanding questions from over 20 years ago will finally be answered.

This isn’t the first time a Lynch TV comeback has been mooted. Apart from three short-lived shows he developed with Frost in the early 90s, at the turn of the century Lynch also got the go-ahead to make a pilot for a TV drama about the murkier side of Hollywood entitled Mulholland Drive.

But he fell out with the network – ABC again – and the pilot was made into a feature film with Naomi Watts. Although critically well received, it was sufficiently indifferent to conventions such as linear narrative and character motivation to explain ABC’s reticence. Looking back on that experience raises the question of just how weird the new Twin Peaksmight be.

That’s the thing about Lynch: he is one of the few longstanding auteurs who is impossible to second guess. There is no more rhyme or reason in his career than there is in his most surreal works.

A psychologist would doubtless attribute the unpredictability to the peripatetic childhood he led. The child of a research scientist with the US Department of Agriculture, Lynch moved all over little-town America with his family. What he seemed to retain from his travels was something solidly American, the sort of simple, down-home attitudes that led him at one time to admire Ronald Reagan.

By his own account, he made friends easily and was filled with wonder by the environments he encountered. “I found the world completely and totally fantastic,” he later recalled, though he found school “a crime against young people”. Yet he was hardly a born rebel; he was in the scouts until he was 15.

He dropped out of art school in Boston with the intention of moving to Europe for three years. He returned to America after two weeks.

Even at this stage elements of his character that would later inform his work can be readily identified. There is the almost naive sense of awe allied to disjointed and thwarted ambitions. It’s this unlikely mix of the unworldly and the bohemian that have been at the centre of his vision. All that was missing was the dark underbelly that would become a recurring motif in his films. And he found that in Philadelphia.

Enrolled at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art, he lived in a crime-ridden area called Fairmount with his newly acquired wife – fellow student Peggy Reavey – and their baby daughter, Jennifer. Lynch later described a mental condition of intense fear that ran riot in a neighbourhood in which people were shot, his house was attacked and twice burgled and his car stolen. “There was violence and hate and filth,” he said. “But the biggest influence in my whole life was that city.” It was in Philadelphia that he made his first short films that featured scenes of vomiting, blood and crying babies. But it was his move to Los Angeles in 1971 that provided the means of making his first feature film.

He studied film-making at the AFI Conservatory and set about filming in black and white a story about a young man in a bleak industrial city whose girlfriend gives birth to an inhuman-looking baby. Eraserhead was one of the most original and discomfiting debuts in American cinema. It went on to become a massive cult hit at late-night cinema and marked the beginning of an oeuvre as baffling as it is inspired.

His two most conventional films followed: The Elephant Man, with John Hurt as John Merrick, the Victorian freak show attraction, and Dune, an adaptation of Frank Herbert’s sci-fi novel. The first was a huge hit, the second an even larger disaster.

But perhaps not as large as what might have had occurred had Lynch taken up George Lucas’s offer to direct the third Star Wars instalment, Return of the Jedi – a prospect so improbable that it practically confirms the existence of a parallel universe..

It was his fourth film that stands as his masterpiece. Released in 1986,Blue Velvet brought together Lynch’s perception of suburban innocence and the dark menace that lies beyond in an exhilarating exploration of sexual obsession. The film also marked Dennis Hopper’s official comeback. He played the foul-mouthed Frank Booth, the very incarnation of pitiless violence.

Lynch’s direction of Hopper in the use of the F-word reveals his quaintly delicate sensibility. Hopper once recalled: “David never said that word. He would just say: ‘Please say that word there.’ He seemed able to write ‘fuck’ but not say it.”

With its visual richness and haunting soundtrack, the film seemed to penetrate right to the heart of the collective subconscious, though for some feminist critics it was simply an old tale of misogyny dressed up in new velvet clothes.

By then, Lynch was on his second marriage, which didn’t survive his affair with the star of the film, Isabella Rossellini. He went on to cast her in Wild at Heart, but the couple split in 1991. Since then he has married twice more, the second time to his current wife, the actress Emily Stofle.

Many of the themes in Blue Velvet prefigured Twin Peaks, not least the unnerving sense that evil lurks just out of view. The question is: will the man whom Mel Brooks once called “Jimmy Stewart from Mars” be able to recreate that almost wholesomely disquieting atmosphere?

He’ll be 69 next year when filming gets under way. Has he lost his touch or can he still peel back the surface of America as if it were a ring-pull lid? Like Dale Cooper, we have no idea where Lynch will lead us. Let’s hope, to quote the special agent, it will be a place both wonderful and strange.

THE LYNCH FILE

Born David Keith Lynch, 20 January 1946 in Missoula, Montana, to Donald, an agricultural research scientist, and Edwina, an English language tutor. The family moved around America throughout Lynch’s childhood.

Best of times Although his debut, Eraserhead, was a big cult success, mainstream recognition arrived with The Elephant Man, which garnered eight Oscar nominations, including two for Lynch: best director and best adapted screenplay.

Worst of times The debacle that was Dune was a setback, as was the cancellation of the original Twin Peaks. But the last decade has been his leanest time as a film-maker, a period in which he has often spoken of a lack of inspiration.

What he says “I can’t live without coffee, transcendental meditation, American Spirit cigarettes, a freedom to create ideas that flow and my sweet wife, Emily.”

What others say “He can be very soulful and poetic. It is not all darkness and confusion.” Mary Sweeney, his third wife, whom he married and divorced in 2006.

http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2014/oct/12/david-lynch-observer-profile-twin-peaks


'Twin Peaks': David Lynch reaps the benefits of a trend he started

Steven Zeitchik
6 October 2014

As he returns to TV with a new 'Twin Peaks,' David Lynch is the latest arrival to a trend he helped start

For years — through his forays into painting and interview digressions into Transcendental Meditation and odd self-reflexive documentary projects and pop-up appearances on "Louie" — fans and freaks have asked: When will David Lynch return? After a quarter century making nearly a dozen of the most interesting/original/weird movies in Christendom (beginning with “Eraserhead” in 1977 and ending with “Mulholland Drive” in 2001), he had made only one movie, and that was the Polish puzzler “Inland Empire” in 2006.

On Monday we had our answer. Lynch was not only returning — he was returning to one of his most famous creations. Showtime came out with a surprise announcement that it would back and air a reprisal of “Twin Peaks.” Lynch and Mark Frost, collaborators on the original, would write and produce a nine-episode limited series, and Lynch would direct every one of the episodes, shooting next year and airing in 2016. After such a long hiatus, one might have imagined Lynch dipping his toe back in slowly. This was a full plunge.

How the new show picks up the story of small-town machinations and the death of Laura Palmer nearly a quarter century since the last check-in, the 1992 film “Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me,” and the series' 1991 cliffhanger will be one of the big narrative questions. So will the returning cast. A statement from Showtime said that the new go-round will be “set in the present day” and “continue the lore of the original series, providing long-awaited answers for the series’ passionate fan base.”

But equally interesting from a Hollywood perspective is what the return means for, and says about, Lynch. The film director, after all, was a pioneer in ways that went beyond the twisted cool of the show itself. Long before dark shows on television, long before cable originals, long before “The Killing” (whose creator admits she borrowed from “Twin Peaks”), and long before most movie directors thought of long-form storytelling or any of the other current TV vogues, there was Lynch. He was just a few years removed from “Blue Velvet” and an Oscar directing nomination, but he was doing the unheard-of — making a show for broadcast prime time.

It didn’t exactly go smoothly, of course. Then-ABC executive Bob Iger famously had to battle executives to get it on the air, and Lynch skirmished heavily with the network over the killer's reveal in the second season (Lynch wanted to delay it, among other things.) But in the show being there, on TV, for millions of people to watch every week, Lynch set the stage for so much great television to follow.

Many creators of dark cable dramas directly pay homage to Lynch. And those who don’t probably owe him a muffin basket anyway, because he was showing decades ago that mainstream Americans would invite dark and weird characters into their homes if you just made those characters compelling enough. (It's telling that he also will direct every episode of the new "Twin Peaks" himself, a tactic used to great effect earlier this year by the feature director Cary Fukunaga on "True Detective" — yet another series that owes a creative debt to Lynch.)

Showtime’s willingness to give Lynch an apparently large amount of freedom is a sign of how far things have come since Lynch began all of this. Though tension is always possible when art and corporations collide, don’t expect anything close to the battles or constraints he fought then. “What more can I say — TWIN PEAKS with David Lynch and Mark Frost on SHOWTIME in 2016!” network topper David Nevins said in the statement, giddy. “To quote Agent Cooper, ‘I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.’”

That all leaves the question of how Lynch will approach the return to the thing he started. The director has long been shattering barriers and conventions, but those are a lot more elastic since he first began hammering away at them on TV more than two decades ago. If you put the original “Twin Peaks” on TV now, it would feel less iconoclastic than it would part of the mainstream zeitgeist. How far Lynch tries to push beyond that will be part of the fun of the new “Twin Peaks.”

Lynch has said he hadn’t decided to actively take a directing hiatus. He just wasn’t feeling motivated to do anything that would end it. “I haven’t gotten the big idea,” he said when I interviewed him two years ago. “I’ve got some fragments that are coming, but not the big idea. If I got an idea that I fell in love with, I’d go to work tomorrow. I just haven’t.”

That’s another bit of iconoclasm since in Hollywood the mantra is to keep working and take any opportunity one can. But Lynch has long shattered the mold. One hopes he’s returning to pick up the pieces, so he can break them all over again.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-david-lynch-twin-peaks-showtime-laura-palmer-20141006-story.html

'Twin Peaks' co-creator Mark Frost on Showtime reboot, the cliffhanger

Meredith Blake
6 October 2014

Showtime made many fans of "Twin Peaks" very happy on Monday when it announced it was reviving the cult favorite as a limited series to air in 2016, set in the modern day.

The delightfully weird drama, which centered on a murder mystery in the small town of Twin Peaks, Wash., and starred Kyle MacLachlan as cherry pie aficionado/FBI Special Agent Dale Cooper, aired for two seasons on ABC before its eventual cancellation in 1991.

The Times spoke to writer and producer Mark Frost, who co-created the series with filmmaker David Lynch, about the rebooted "Twin Peaks," what happened to [character's name redacted] after the series finale and the original's enduring legacy.

People have been hoping for a revival for a long time now. How'd you finally decide to do it?

Every once in a while we’d get together and think about it. It was really about three years ago when we were at lunch at Musso & Frank. We started talking and it kinda lit a spark between us. So we sat with it and we kindled it and we fanned the flames until we knew it was taking us somewhere where we really wanted to go. And we've kind of been working on it ever since.

What was that initial conversation about?

It was kind of a global conversation about the world of "Twin Peaks" and the effect that it still seemed to hold for people, the attraction they felt to this place and these people and we suddenly saw a way to move forward and just ran with it.

And why do you think it still has so many fans, especially at a time when there are a lot of weird, dark, unusual shows on television?

I know. It’s to me part of the mystery of the show. Why has this show been so enduringly attractive to people? I honestly don’t know the answer. You really have to talk to all the people who feel as strongly as they do and ask them because their answers will be just as valid as mine. One of the things we did notice as we've been thinking about it is people seem to remember it even better than we do. It’s kind of an important thing for a lot of people in their lives. And we feel a sense of responsibility about that and we want to do everything we can to honor it.
Interactive

Is there any trepidation or anxiety about the revival? It's safe to say expectations will be high.

Yeah, I think it’s safe to say that people would be hoping for a lot and we feel that there is a pressure to not just do what we did before but improve on it or top it. That’s going to be our intention every step of the way.

"Twin Peaks" aired on network TV, but there are now many outlets for television that's more experimental and groundbreaking. Do you think the show might have lasted longer had it been introduced in such an environment?

All I can do is speculate. There are so many great, powerful shows now, I guess we'll see how this one does when it comes back as a benchmark. We’re very flattered whenever people talk about this as a show that helped them think that maybe there was a way for them to do what they did. We were very happy to kick down that door for people if that is in fact what we did. Hopefully we’ll get to kick down the door ourselves.

There hasn't been any information yet about casting but I'm wondering how you go about reviving without a cast set. Do you see who's available and build the story from there? Or just proceed as if everyone from the original is willing to participate?

I don’t know if I can speak to that without giving stuff away. The main way to think about is that we’re going to write the show exactly as we see fit and hopefully we’ll find the circumstances to make it happen.

Have you written it yet?

We’re in the process right now.

What can you tell us about the narrative?

What I can tell you is there will be a very strong central storyline. And there will be lots of other places that we’ll go as well. That’s really all I can say.

As fans know, the series ended with one of the most devastating cliffhangers in TV history. Do you yourself know how that story ended, and will the new series provide any resolution in that regard?

We have very clear idea as to what happened and it’s not going to be something that will seem ambiguous when you see it.

Creatively, this is going to be different from the network series in that you and David Lynch will write all nine episodes, and he'll direct the whole run. How do you think that will affect the series?

We just had a feeling that this was something we created together and the only way we really we could see going back to it was if we did it ourselves. We’re really excited that that’s how it turned out because I think that's the right way to to do it. It’s going to rise or fall on our efforts, and our efforts alone and that's how it should be judged.

How did you decide to take it to Showtime?

It was earlier this year; we had a great meeting with them. It turned out perhaps not by chance that Gary Levine, who developed the show at ABC 25 years ago, is now the executive vice president of original programming at Showtime, and that just felt right. We felt very comfortable with Gary, who is a good friend. But I've known David Nevins for quite a while. The two Davids really hit it off, so off we went.

Did you have to go to any extra effort to keep this under wraps?

I would guess that not even the NSA knew about this.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-twin-peaks-revival-creator-mark-frost-20141006-story.html